This paper examines whether associations between personality and attained status are socially contingent such that valued personality characteristics are stronger predictors of attainments at lower levels of parental education (the resource substitution hypothesis) but such characteristics are less likely among the children of less educated parents (the structural amplification hypothesis). We examine these possibilities by drawing on the Mini-IPIP (a standardized instrument assessing personality), the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, and a statistical framework to test for moderated mediation. Results reveal that (1) personality characteristics have notable associations with educational attainment, hourly wages, and self-direction at work; (2) personality often has stronger associations with status attainments at lower levels of parental education; and (3) personality is a weak mediator of associations between parental education and attained status. That is, the children of less educated parents may benefit more from valued personality characteristics, but they are slightly less likely to possess such characteristics. These results are discussed in terms of new avenues for research into diverse forms of capital and status attainment.
Event Date
-
Venue
SSRI-Gross Hall 270
Event Type